ArticleScientific reports2025
Interactive networks of donors and recipients of the TetM gene and its evolutionary dynamics across the bacterial domain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Codon usage optimization contributes to evolutionary dynamics of TetM following its acquisition via interspecies and intergeneric recombination events in recipient bacteria.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Evolution and transmission landscape of the staphylococcalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying primary donors and recipients of the tetM gene is crucial for gaining a deeper understanding of the dynamics underlying the dissemination of resistance to tetracyclines in natural bacterial populations, including those of human and animal pathogens. This study modeled the major donor-recipient network of tetM, also providing important insights into the primary evolutionary mechanisms of this gene. The RDP4- and SplitsTree-embedded algorithms were used to detect genetic recombination events of tetM loci from different bacterial species and genera. FUBAR, MEME, and MEGA11 were employed to determine the evolutionary dynamics of this gene. A large tetM donor-recipient species network, exhibiting different bacterial genera, was determined based on the RDP4- and SplitsTree-generated inferences (P ≤ 3.75E-02; bootstrap and fit values ≥ 90 and ≥ 94.9 respectively). 3 sites were identified as undergoing episodic diversifying selection, while 42 sites were under pervasive negative selection for this gene, with a discrete Gamma distribution value of 0.0500. Notably, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus equinus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Gardnerella vaginalis were suggested to be the predominant donors of tetM involved in inter-species and/or intergeneric recombination. Genetic recombination and pervasive negative selection were suggested to be the primary driving forces underlying the evolution of tetM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.