Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068165›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating convolutional neural networks using residual blocks and global average pooling techniques for predicting sediment concentration.

Cheng-Chia Huang, Che-Cheng Chang, Chiao-Ming Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng-Chia HuangDepartment of Water Resources Engineering and Conservation, Feng Chia University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Che-Cheng ChangDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung City, Taiwan. checchang@fcu.edu.tw.
Chiao-Ming ChangDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung City, Taiwan.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 111-2625-M-035-007-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring sediment concentration (SC) is a challenge in water resource management due to environmental complexities and sensor limitations. Hence, developing a monitoring technology that is easy to operate, high precision, and cost-effective is forward-looking. This research is based on convolutional neural networks and further introduces the concepts of residual block and global average pooling layer to develop a prediction model (CNN-SCP, Convolutional Neural Networks-Sediment Concentration Prediction) to predict sediment concentration. Here, residual blocks (RB) mitigate the vanishing gradient problem and enhance feature propagation for improved stability and convergence. Also, the global average pooling layer reduces parameters, prevents overfitting, and enhances generalization by replacing fully connected layers with spatial averaging, improving model robustness and efficiency. As a result, the proposed model improves the performance of primitive convolutional neural networks, which are apparently better than the existing ones in the literature regarding many metrics, such as MAE is 115.42 and 263.67, MAPE is 6.38 and 14.67, RMSE is 134.24 and 294.51, and CC is 0.97 and 0.90, respectively, by comparing the 5RBs and previous. These results demonstrate the potential of CNN-SCP for future real-time sediment monitoring and early warning system deployment.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural network (CNN)Global average pooling (GAP)Real-timeResidual block (RB)Sediment concentration (SC)

Identifiers

PMID41068165
PMCPMC12511301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.