Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A new algorithm for multiple medical image encryption based on stacked representation and block division.

Yousef S Alsahafi, Akram Y Sarhan, Yasmin M Elnabawy, Khalid M Hosny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yousef S AlsahafiDepartment of IT, College of Computing and Information Technology, University of Jeddah, Khulis, Saudi Arabia. ysalsahafi@uj.edu.sa.
Akram Y SarhanDepartment of IT, College of Computing and Information Technology, University of Jeddah, Khulis, Saudi Arabia.
Yasmin M ElnabawyDepartment of CS, Faculty of Computers and Information, Suez University, Suez, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0594-6187
Khalid M HosnyDepartment of IT, Faculty of Computers and Information, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. k_hosny@zu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8065-8977

Funding

University of Jeddah University of Jeddah
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of big data, medical imaging systems create millions of medical images daily. Securing these images during their transmission and storage is a challenging task. Encryption is a practical approach for securing medical images, as it ensures the security of these images while preserving their sensitive contents. Multiple-image encryption is preferable to single-image encryption, in which patches of medical images are encrypted simultaneously. A novel multi-medical image encryption algorithm based on stack representation and block division is proposed. During preprocessing, the medical images are stacked into a 3D cube to prepare for the encryption process. The cube experiences a block division phase, followed by individual confusion and diffusion phases for each block. These phases utilize different keys generated from a Baker chaotic map, incorporating swapping and XOR operations, which result in a fully encrypted cube. The scalability and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm are tested through experiments, revealing its promise as a secure approach for encrypting color and grayscale medical images. The proposed MIE algorithm is robust against various attacks, exhibiting superior performance in terms of speed and security compared to similar methods.

Indexed as

Baker chaotic mapBlock divisionConfusion and diffusionMultiple medical image encryptionStacked images

Identifiers

PMID41068161
PMCPMC12511610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.