Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068160›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

On the importance of the flow field in inexpensive optical aerosol particle counting and sizing.

Charis Loizidis, Christoforos Skourides, Spyros Bezantakos, Neoclis Hadjigeorgiou, George Biskos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charis LoizidisClimate and Atmosphere Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 2121, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Christoforos SkouridesClimate and Atmosphere Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 2121, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Spyros BezantakosClimate and Atmosphere Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 2121, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Neoclis HadjigeorgiouClimate and Atmosphere Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 2121, Nicosia, Cyprus.
George BiskosClimate and Atmosphere Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 2121, Nicosia, Cyprus. g.biskos@cyi.ac.cy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical Particle Sizers (OPSs) are widely used for measuring size distributions of particles larger than ca. 0.2 μm. To do so, they use mirrors or lenses to gather light scattered by particles passing through a focused beam, directing it to a photo-detector that produces electric pulses from the scattering events. Considering their ability to provide near real-time measurements with minimal attendance and maintenance, and to expand the networks of Particulate Matter (PM) monitoring, several manufacturers have developed low-cost and compact OPS systems. Despite that low-cost OPSs are already available in the market and employed for monitoring PM concentrations, their reported values typically deviate from those of high-end instruments, warranting further efforts to improve their performance. In this work, we designed and built a custom-made yet inexpensive OPS optical system, and studied its performance using a combination of computational and experimental methods at different flow conditions. Our results demonstrate the importance of the flow field within the OPS optical system, and how this can affect its counting and sizing ability. The overall performance of our OPS optical system is very similar to that of high-end instruments, exhibiting a counting efficiency of 50% for particles having a diameter of 320 nm, and a sizing resolution of below 15% for 500-nm particles, complying with the ISO 21501-1 and 21501-4 standards.

Identifiers

PMID41068160
PMCPMC12511441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.