Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing wellbore stability through machine learning for sustainable hydrocarbon exploitation.

Mohatsim Mahetaji, Jwngsar Brahma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohatsim MahetajiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. mohatsim.mahetaji37934@paruluniversity.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2442-8891
Jwngsar BrahmaDepartment of Applied Sciences. School of Engineering, Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wellbore instability manifested through formation breakouts and drilling-induced fractures poses serious technical and economic risks in drilling operations. It can lead to non-productive time, stuck pipe incidents, wellbore collapse, and increased mud costs, ultimately compromising operational safety and project profitability. Accurately predicting such instabilities is therefore critical for optimizing drilling strategies and minimizing costly interventions. This study explores the application of machine learning (ML) regression models to predict wellbore instability more accurately, using open-source well data from the Netherlands well Q10-06. The dataset spans a depth range of 2177.80 to 2350.92 m, comprising 1137 data points at 0.1524 m intervals, and integrates composite well logs, real-time drilling parameters, and wellbore trajectory information. Borehole enlargement, defined as the difference between Caliper (CAL) and Bit Size (BS), was used as the target output to represent instability. Twelve regression models were evaluated, including Linear and Polynomial Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Histogram Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Regression, Multi-layer Perceptron, k-Nearest Neighbors, Gaussian and Bernoulli Naive Bayes, and Gaussian Process Regression. Model performance was assessed using the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Determination (DC). Among them, Histogram Gradient Boosting yielded the highest prediction accuracy (RMSE = 8.5138 ×10

Indexed as

Decision treeGradient boostingHistogram gradient boostingMLPetroleumRandom forestRegressionWellbore stability

Identifiers

PMID41068144
PMCPMC12511603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.