Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068139›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring parameter optimisation in machine learning algorithms for locomotor task discrimination using wearable sensors.

L D Hughes, M Bencsik, M Bisele, C T Barnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L D HughesSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.
M BencsikSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.
M BiseleHeidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
C T BarnettSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK. cleveland.barnett@ntu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate identification of locomotion states from wearable sensor data using machine learning relies heavily on carefully selecting algorithm parameters, which remains a challenging task. This study systematically optimised key parameters-including window length, sampling frequency, temporal resolution, overlapping value, and normalisation effects-to enhance the accuracy of machine learning models for distinguishing different locomotor tasks. Our study was conducted on participants (N = 35, 19 ♂10 ♀, 27.4 ± 26.5 years, 1.74 ± 0.8 m, 71.5 ± 11.3 kg) who wore accelerometers on the sacrum, thighs and shanks. Principal component and discriminant function analyses were applied to acceleration data from three locomotor tasks: self-selected slow, normal and fast walking. The parameters explored for the optimisation of the algorithm were accelerometer window length, sampling frequency, spectral temporal resolution, overlapping value, and accelerometer amplitude normalisation effects. Unnormalised data, with longer feature window lengths and decreasing temporal resolutions, yielded the highest quality discrimination. Setting the sampling rate to 40 Hz and overlapping value to 66% provided optimal discrimination. Baseline results highlight that the sacrum is the best-performing location, yet optimal (longer) window lengths, and optimal (shorter) temporal resolutions change the best-performing sensor attachment location to the shanks. Specific values of parameters were found to be optimal for our study, and these results can guide manufacturers, engineers, and researchers in designing wearable devices and machine learning algorithms that more effectively identify locomotor tasks. Practitioners and clinicians may also use these findings to select appropriate tools or methodologies tailored to their specific research or clinical objectives.

Indexed as

AccelerometryLocomotionMachine LearningWalkingWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDiscriminant function analysisLocomotionMachine learningOptimisationPrincipal component analysisWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID41068139
PMCPMC12511298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.