ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep ensemble learning framework for brain tumor classification using data balancing and fine-tuning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Superfast prediction of brain tumours through adaptive incremental pre-training and re-training through transfer learning using state-of-the-art ResNet18 architectural model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Dual-Branch Frequency-Aware Attention Framework for Rare Neurological Disease Classification from Brain MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantum-inspired optimization of transformer-capsule networks for accurate brain tumor segmentation and classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors are a critical medical challenge, requiring accurate and timely diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. Misclassification can significantly reduce life expectancy, emphasizing the need for precise diagnostic methods. Manual analysis of extensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets is both labor-intensive and time-consuming, underscoring the importance of an efficient deep learning (DL) model to enhance diagnostic accuracy. This study presents an innovative deep ensemble approach based on transfer learning (TL) for effective brain tumor classification. The proposed methodology incorporates comprehensive preprocessing, data balancing through synthetic data generation (SDG), reconstruction and fine-tuning of TL architectures, and ensemble modeling using Genetic Algorithm-based Weight Optimization (GAWO) and Grid Search-based Weight Optimization (GSWO) used to optimize model weights for enhanced performance. Experiments were performed on the Figshare Contrast-Enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) brain tumor dataset, consisting of 3064 images. The proposed approach demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving classification accuracies of 99.57% with Xception, 99.48% with ResNet50V2, 99.33% with ResNet152V2, 99.39% with InceptionResNetV2, 99.78% with GAWO, and 99.84% with GSWO. The GSWO achieved the highest average accuracy of 99.84% across five-fold cross-validation among other DL models. The comparative analysis highlights the superiority of the proposed model over State of Arts (SOA) works, showcasing its potential to assist neurologists and clinicians in making precise and timely diagnostic decisions. The study concludes that the optimized deep ensemble model is a robust and reliable tool for brain tumor classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.