Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068047›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Adjacent Vertebral BMD Decline After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Kai Sun, Bo Zhang, Mingyuan Di, Yuanzhi Weng, Weijia William Lu, Chao Chen, Jiaguo Zhao, Meng Fan, Qiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kai SunClinical College of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-8386
Bo ZhangClinical College of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Mingyuan DiClinical College of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yuanzhi WengDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-0878
Weijia William LuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Chao ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Jiaguo ZhaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Meng FanTianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-8394
Qiang YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-9734

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFC2420100the Non-pfofit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2024-JKCS-17the Specific Project of Basic Research Cooperation Of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei J230020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLateral lumbar interbody fusion technology may have a protective effect on the paravertebral and spinal ligaments during surgery, resulting in positive effects on bone mineral density (BMD). However, evidence is lacking on the change in vertebral bone density of patients. The changes in bone density in patients after lumbar fusion surgery are closely related to the occurrence of mechanical complications such as proximal border kyphosis, screw extraction, and adjacent vertebral fractures. Therefore, the aim is to investigate the changes in the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the adjacent vertebral cancellous bone and endplate at the fusion level in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

methodsThe medical records of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent LLIF surgery in our hospital from March 2018 to October 2021 were retrospectively examined. The volumetric BMD of the cancellous bone and endplate adjacent to the lumbar fusion segment was measured before the operation and during postoperative follow-up. The measured volumetric BMD included the level of the upper/lower instrumented vertebra and the endplate (UIV + 1; LIV + 1; UIV + 1e; and LIV + 1e). Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney test, Fisher exact test, univariable, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were executed in this study.

resultsA total of 32 patients were included in the study, including 27 women and 5 men, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 7.1 years. The preoperative vBMD values in the UIV + 1, LIV + 1, UIV + 1e, and LIV + 1e groups were greater than those at the postoperative follow-up (131.9 ± 34.8 vs. 115.8 ± 30.8; 134.8 ± 37.0 vs. 117.2 ± 32.1, p < 0.001; 312.9 ± 79.3 vs. 287.7 ± 85.2, p = 0.007; 314.7 ± 71.4 vs. 296.1 ± 59.8, p = 0.042). The vBMD changes and rates of change in the cancellous and endplate regions were 16.1% ± 17.7% (11.4% ± 13.0%), 12.2% ± 12.1% (17.3% ± 17.5%), 11.4% ± 18.3% (-25.2% ± 49.2%), and 7.2% ± 18.5% (-18.6% ± 49.8%) in the UIV + 1, LIV + 1, UIV + 1e, and LIV + 1e groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the preoperative vBMD, postoperative vBMD, or percent vBMD change between UIV + 1 and LIV + 1. However, there was a significant difference in the endplate vBMD at follow-up (p = 0.035).

conclusionWe evaluated the changes of vBMD of the cancellous bone and endplates adjacent to the vertebral body, cephalad or caudal to the fused level in LLIF patients through QCT, and can provide a new approach for reducing the occurrence of mechanically related complications after vertebral fusion surgery.

Indexed as

Bone DensityLumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FusionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesadjacent vertebrabone mineral densitylateral lumbar interbody fusionphantom‐based quantitative computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID41068047
PMCPMC12580222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.