ReviewLife science alliance2025
Human brain slice cultures: translational applications and ethical considerations.
Review in Life science alliance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From mice to clinical relevance: humanizing neuroscience with human-based model systems.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Toward functional precision oncology: organotypic brain slices in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Live-cell physiology in human brain tissue culture-the potential, the challenges, and the lessons learned.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human organotypic brain slice cultures have emerged as a pivotal tool to study the complexities of the human brain. Human organotypic brain slice cultures preserve the structural integrity, cellular diversity, and vascular networks of living brain tissue, maintaining in vivo characteristics. This advancement enables accurate temporal modeling of neurological diseases and facilitates precise experimental manipulations, accelerating therapeutic development. However, their use raises important ethical and philosophical considerations, including issues of donor consent and the potential for neural activity that prompts questions about consciousness. This study outlines these emerging concerns, emphasizing the need for guidelines that balance scientific innovation with ethical responsibility, particularly in relation to donor consent, transparency, and long-term use of living human tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.