ArticleBMJ open2025
Perceived Social Risk Scale: development and validation in relation to social status and depression in the UK.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate the Perceived Social Risk Scale (PSRS) for assessing perceptions of socially risky behaviours, and to validate it against existing psychological measures such as perceived social status and depressive symptoms in a UK sample of older adolescents and adults.
designA cross-sectional study involving exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
settingParticipants were recruited from the Cardiff University's Department of Psychology participant pool (students completing studies for course credit) and Prolific Academic (a crowdsourcing platform for research volunteers). Data collection occurred between 17 February and 6 May 2024.
participantsA total of 640 UK participants, including both men and women, aged 18-65.
main outcome measuresWe measured the internal consistency of the PSRS, test-retest reliability and validity against measures including rejection sensitivity, perceived social status, depressive symptoms and resistance to peer influence. Moderation analyses examined the role of perceived social status, age and a sense of belonging in the relationship between PSRS scores and depressive symptoms.
resultsThe PSRS showed excellent internal consistency (
conclusionsOur results confirm that social risk is not a uniform construct but is instead multidimensional. The PSRS offers a reliable and valid tool for assessing multidimensional social risk-taking, with strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The interaction between depression and local perceived social status highlights the importance of perceived status on social risk perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.