Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41067776›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of precise subsegmental bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation treatment in severe emphysema.

Han Yang, Si Chen, Lin Ye, Felix Jf Herth, Jiayuan Sun

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06152107 (A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Precise Subsegmental Treatment With InterVapor for Severe Emphysema), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06152107 narecruitingnot on this map

A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Precise Subsegmental Treatment With InterVapor for Severe Emphysema

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Chest HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsSevere EmphysemaArmsBTVA treatment plus optimal medical therapy (GOLD guidelines)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Han Yang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Si Chen *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin YeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Felix Jf HerthPneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, BW, Germany felix.herth@med.uni-heidelberg.de xkyyjysun@163.com.
Jiayuan SunDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China felix.herth@med.uni-heidelberg.de xkyyjysun@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-3256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation (BTVA) is a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction technique, also recommended by the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines. Previous studies on BTVA have primarily focused on segmental treatment, targeting the most severely affected lung segments while preserving healthier areas. However, there is considerable variability in the severity of emphysema within subsegments of these lung segments, suggesting that a more precise approach could potentially improve treatment outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subsegmental BTVA, which may better preserve healthy lung tissue while more accurately targeting the most severely affected regions in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label clinical trial conducted in China. A total of 100 patients with severe emphysema, who continue to experience significant symptoms despite optimal medical therapy according to GOLD guidelines, will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group (subsegmental BTVA) or the control group (segmental BTVA), both receiving optimal medical therapy. BTVA will be performed in two separate procedures, with the second procedure occurring at least 6 weeks and no more than 6 months after the first. The primary endpoint is the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s at 6 months following the second procedure. Secondary endpoints include changes in lung volumes, quality of life (measured by the St. George's respiratory questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients), other parameters in pulmonary function tests, and 6 min walk distance at 6 and 12 months, etc. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (IS23073). Additionally, study approval was obtained from local regulatory boards at each site before the study commenced. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 November 2023 (NCT06152107).

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesBronchoscopyPneumonectomyPulmonary EmphysemaChinaFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBronchoscopyClinical TrialEmphysemaLung DiseasesResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID41067776
PMCPMC12517035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.