ArticleBMJ open2025
Application of patient journey mapping in patients with breast cancer: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Journey Mapping Study on the Full-Course Management of Elderly Patients Undergoing Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Patient pathways to PrEP persistence: a qualitative resilience-focused journey mapping study with cisgender Black and Latino men who have sex with men and clinical PrEP staff at a federally qualified health center.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Construction and practice of a four-dimensional integrated one-stop outpatient service model based on patient journey mapping.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis scoping review synthesises the application of patient journey mapping (PJM) in breast cancer care to provide insights for enhancing patient-centred services and improving the quality of life for patients with breast cancer.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang and SinoMed were systematically searched for relevant studies published between 1 May 2005 and 1 May 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies involving adults (≥18 years) with breast cancer that examined patient journeys were eligible, regardless of whether a formal PJM approach was used. All study designs in healthcare or community settings were considered. Exclusions included studies on other cancers, duplicates, inaccessible full texts, non-English/Chinese publications and non-original articles. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, with a third resolving discrepancies. Information on study characteristics, methods and PJM applications was narratively synthesised and tabulated.
resultsA total of 20 studies published from 2011 to 2024 were included. Four primary approaches to PJM in breast cancer care were identified, with cancer care stage mapping being the most prevalent. PJM illustrated patients' trajectories, experiences and emotions, revealed critical interaction points such as diagnosis, decision-making and follow-up, and highlighted delays, coordination gaps and opportunities for service improvement. Most studies incorporated four core elements-patients, touchpoints, timelines and experiences-and emphasised patient perspectives across the care continuum, despite methodological heterogeneity.
conclusionsThis review shows that PJM has been applied to illustrate longitudinal healthcare experiences, identifies key touchpoints and supports the design and improvement of breast cancer care services. Most studies underscored patient perspectives and emotional needs, but current PJM applications remain fragmented, hospital-focused and weakly integrated across care settings and families. Future research should refine methodologies and apply digital technologies to develop personalised, dynamic maps that may enhance patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.