ArticleJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2026
Use of the TIPS Technique as a Possible Method of Acute Inhalation Toxicity Assessment.
Article in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of the TIPS Technique as a Possible Method of Acute Inhalation Toxicity Assessment.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute inhalation toxicity studies provide crucial information regarding short-term exposure to volatile chemicals and help to ensure the safe handling and use of these chemicals. However, acute inhalation toxicity assessment requires specialized equipment, and most animal facilities are not able to carry out such studies. Consequently, an extremely large number of chemicals remain unassessed. Therefore, we investigated intra-Tracheal Intra-Pulmonary Spraying (TIPS) as a method for testing the acute inhalation toxicity of volatile chemicals. TIPS does not require specialized equipment and consequently is an approach that can be used by essentially all animal facilities. We diluted 12 chemicals in physiological saline and administered the chemicals to test animals using TIPS. When the acute LD50 values obtained by TIPS were converted to LC50 values, there was good agreement between the TIPS LC50 values and the reported inhalation LC50 values of nine of 11 water-soluble chemicals. Two water-soluble chemicals had TIPS LC50 values that were more than 2.5-fold higher than the published inhalation LC50 values, and water-insoluble xylene had an LC50 value that was more than 2.5-fold lower than the published inhalation LC50 value. This strong agreement between TIPS LC50 values and published LC50 values suggests that TIPS has the potential to be used for acute inhalation toxicity testing. However, further studies are needed to establish testing systems that will identify solutes that can and cannot be used for TIPS testing of different water-soluble chemicals and for TIPS testing of water-insoluble chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.