ArticleNeuroImage2025
Contentopic mapping in ventral and dorsal association cortex: The topographical organization of manipulable object information.
Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delineating In Vivo T1-Weighted Intensity Profiles Within the Human Insula Cortex Using 7-Tesla MRI.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- The Neural Organization of Visual Information in the Auditory Cortex of the Congenitally Deaf.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Manipulable object processing reveals distinct neural and behavioral signatures for visual, functional, and manipulation properties.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Neural and behavioral similarity-driven tuning curves for manipulable objects.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how object information is neurally organized is fundamental to unravel object recognition. The best-known neural organizational principle of information is topographical mapping of specific dimensions. Such maps have been shown for sensorimotor information within sensorimotor cortices (e.g., retinotopy). Here we ask whether there are topographic maps - by analogy, contentopic maps - for mid-level object-related dimensions. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and population receptive field analysis to measure tuning of neural populations to selected manipulable object-related action-based dimensions. We show maps in dorsal and ventral occipital cortex that code for the score of each object on each target dimension in a linear progression following a particular direction along the cortical surface. Maps for each dimension are distinct, are consistent across individuals, and are not exhausted by participant-specific eccentricity maps, nor by high-definition eccentricity maps derived from available databases. Thus, object information is potentially coded in multiple topographical maps - i.e., contentopic maps. These contentopic maps refer to intermediate level visual and visuomotor representations, potentially computed from the interaction of lower-level visual features through non-linear transformation following gestalt principles. This suggests that topography is a widespread and non-incidental strategy for the organization of information in the brain that leads to greatly reduced connectivity-related metabolic costs and fast and efficient readouts of information for stimuli discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.