Observational studyThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2026
Timing of quality of life and lung function changes during the first year following lung transplantation: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
Observational study in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung transplantation (LT) has been shown to improve lung function and quality of life (QoL). We sought to clarify if QoL improvements coincide with improvements in spirometry assessments in the first post-transplant year.
methodsIn the multicenter observational Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-20 study, LT recipients had longitudinal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and QoL measurements, specifically the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), collected at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-LT. We assessed whether best QoL scores occurred before, simultaneously, or after best FEV1.
resultsOf 803 recipients, 702 met the inclusion criteria. The best total SGRQ score occurred before best FEV1 in 16.0% of patients, simultaneously in 28.3%, and afterward in 55.7%. Similarly, the best SF-36 physical score occurred before best FEV1 in 18.7% of patients, simultaneously in 32.7%, and afterward in 48.6%. Single LTs, age >65 years, male sex, and diagnosis other than cystic lung disease were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving best QoL after best FEV1.
conclusionsBoth spirometry and multiple physical and social QoL domains improved over the first post-LT year, but these improvements did not necessarily occur simultaneously. Nearly half of patients reached their best respiratory-specific and physical QoL scores after best FEV1; however, timing varied by recipient characteristics. As the pace of post-LT recovery is multifactorial, our findings provide insights to patients and providers regarding anticipated post-transplant changes and highlight the importance of considering both spirometry and QoL measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.