ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Reconstructing ventricular activation sequences from epicardial data: Insights from Geodesic Back-Propagation optimization in porcine models.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting ventricular arrhythmia in myocardial ischemia using deep learning.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac digital twins (CDTs) are emerging as powerful tools in personalized medicine, providing subject-specific models to simulate and understand cardiac function. A central challenge in constructing CDTs is accurately personalizing the structure and function of the His-Purkinje system (HPS), which determines ventricular activation. In this study, we leveraged a novel modified Geodesic-BP method to infer early activation sites (EASs) from epicardial activation times. The EASs can then serve as a surrogate for Purkinje-myocardial junctions, facilitating anterograde ventricular activation. We used both experimental porcine (N = 5) and synthetic (N = 5) datasets of epicardial activation times measured or assigned to locations on an electrode sock. For both datasets, we optimized for initial estimates of 5, 50, 100, and 200 EASs and assessed output variability by repeating the inference process 10 times. Assessments were based on matching the predicted activation times at both the epicardial locations and from intracardiac measurements made with multielectrode needles, and throughout the ventricular myocardium for the synthetic dataset. The algorithm could consistently recover global ventricular activation patterns from epicardial data alone. For the experimental dataset, the minimum and maximum mean absolute differences were 0.19 ms and 3.86 ms on the epicardial sock and 2.65 ms and 10.69 ms for the needles. For the synthetic dataset, the corresponding values were 0.13 ms and 2.81 ms on the sock and 2.42 ms and 14.07 ms ms throughout the ventricular myocardium. However, discrepancies between the epicardial surface and intramural myocardium, overfitting of EASs, and variability across repeated runs revealed key limitations. These findings highlight both the overall potential and current limitations of inferring EASs using the proposed optimization approach. They demonstrate the feasibility of deriving informative activation patterns from limited data, while underscoring the need to incorporate stronger physiological priors and anatomical constraints. Ultimately, our results motivate future efforts to refine simulation-based personalization frameworks, improve robustness, and enhance the physiological realism of CDTs for more accurate and reliable applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.