Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066826›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025

Reconstructing ventricular activation sequences from epicardial data: Insights from Geodesic Back-Propagation optimization in porcine models.

Lindsay C R Tanner, Anna Busatto, Thomas Grandits, Jake A Bergquist, Brian Zenger, Simone Pezzuto, Gernot Plank, Rob S MacLeod, Karli Gillette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lindsay C R TannerScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Nora Eccles Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America. Electronic address: lindsay.c.r.tanner@utah.edu.
Anna BusattoScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Nora Eccles Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Thomas GranditsDepartment of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Jake A BergquistScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Nora Eccles Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Brian ZengerDepartment of Medicine - Cardiovascular Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States of America.
Simone PezzutoDepartment of Mathematics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Gernot PlankDivision of Biophysics and Medical Physics, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Rob S MacLeodScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Nora Eccles Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Karli GilletteScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Division of Biophysics and Medical Physics, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JURRUS, ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing Legacy TransitionR24GM136986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2020 to 2022
$1.6M
Integration of Uncertainty Quantification with SCIRun Bioelectric Field Simulation PipelineU24EB029012 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029012NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM136986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac digital twins (CDTs) are emerging as powerful tools in personalized medicine, providing subject-specific models to simulate and understand cardiac function. A central challenge in constructing CDTs is accurately personalizing the structure and function of the His-Purkinje system (HPS), which determines ventricular activation. In this study, we leveraged a novel modified Geodesic-BP method to infer early activation sites (EASs) from epicardial activation times. The EASs can then serve as a surrogate for Purkinje-myocardial junctions, facilitating anterograde ventricular activation. We used both experimental porcine (N = 5) and synthetic (N = 5) datasets of epicardial activation times measured or assigned to locations on an electrode sock. For both datasets, we optimized for initial estimates of 5, 50, 100, and 200 EASs and assessed output variability by repeating the inference process 10 times. Assessments were based on matching the predicted activation times at both the epicardial locations and from intracardiac measurements made with multielectrode needles, and throughout the ventricular myocardium for the synthetic dataset. The algorithm could consistently recover global ventricular activation patterns from epicardial data alone. For the experimental dataset, the minimum and maximum mean absolute differences were 0.19 ms and 3.86 ms on the epicardial sock and 2.65 ms and 10.69 ms for the needles. For the synthetic dataset, the corresponding values were 0.13 ms and 2.81 ms on the sock and 2.42 ms and 14.07 ms ms throughout the ventricular myocardium. However, discrepancies between the epicardial surface and intramural myocardium, overfitting of EASs, and variability across repeated runs revealed key limitations. These findings highlight both the overall potential and current limitations of inferring EASs using the proposed optimization approach. They demonstrate the feasibility of deriving informative activation patterns from limited data, while underscoring the need to incorporate stronger physiological priors and anatomical constraints. Ultimately, our results motivate future efforts to refine simulation-based personalization frameworks, improve robustness, and enhance the physiological realism of CDTs for more accurate and reliable applications.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesModels, CardiovascularPericardiumSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVentricular FunctionAlgorithmsAnimalsSwineCardiac digital twinCardiac electrophysiology modelingEpicardial mappingGeodesic Back-PropagationHis-Purkinje systemVentricular activation

Identifiers

PMID41066826
PMCPMC13295400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.