Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066648›Full record

ReviewReviews in medical virology2025

Landscape of Prophylactic Strategies Against Human Parainfluenza Virus Type 3.

Clémence Vacher, Julia Dubois, Marie-Eve Hamelin, Guy Boivin, Manuel Rosa-Calatrava

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in medical virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clémence VacherCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team VirPath, Inserm, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Julia DuboisCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team VirPath, Inserm, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-2968
Marie-Eve HamelinCentre de Recherche en Infectiologie of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7568-5097
Guy BoivinCentre de Recherche en Infectiologie of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Manuel Rosa-CalatravaCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team VirPath, Inserm, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-9527

Funding

CIHR 148361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human parainfluenza virus-type 3 (HPIV3) is a respiratory virus responsible for mild illnesses in most of the population and severe illnesses, such as bronchiolitis and pneumonia, in young children, immunocompromised individuals and the elderly. To date, no vaccines nor antiviral drugs have been approved against HPIV3, despite its significant burden in vulnerable people. In this review, we present both past and current prophylactic strategies against HPIV3, such as live-attenuated virus, vector-based, subunit and mRNA vaccine candidates or antibody-based passive protection. For each strategy, we give an overview of the most promising candidates evaluated in preclinical studies and we report immunogenicity and protection data from clinical trials. Finally, we discuss the most important challenges regarding those vaccine strategies and their potential administration to the different vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Parainfluenza VaccinesParainfluenza Virus 3, HumanRespirovirus InfectionsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralClinical Trials as TopicHumansVaccines, AttenuatedAntibodies, ViralParainfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Attenuatedmonoclonal antibodiesparainfluenza virus type 3respiratory infectionsvaccine candidates

Identifiers

PMID41066648
PMCPMC12510674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.