ArticleHuman molecular genetics2025
Determining off-target effects of splice-switching antisense oligonucleotides using short read RNAseq in neuronally differentiated human induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and toxicity assessment of antisense oligonucleotides in brain-relevant human cellular models.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Chemical Modification Strategies for Therapeutic Oligonucleotides: Mechanism Compatibility, Design Trade-Offs, and Translational Barriers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Strategies Targeting the Molecular Pathogenesis of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: Current Status and Future Directions.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Developing antisense oligomer biotics "asobiotics" as precision antibacterials: designs, strategies, and considerations for future success.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) are small pieces of chemically modified DNA or RNA that bind to RNA in a sequence-specific manner based on Watson-Crick base-pairing. Splice-switching AONs are designed to modulate pre-mRNA splicing, thereby for instance restoring protein expression or modifying the eventual protein to restore its function or reduce its toxicity. Given the current lack of in silico methods that adequately predict off-target splicing events, assessment of off-target effects of AONs in human cells using RNAseq could be a promising approach. The identification and prioritization of potential off-target effects for validation and further investigation into the biological relevance would contribute to the development of safe and effective AONs. In this study, we used three different splice-switching AONs targeting three different human transcripts to study their transcriptome-wide, hybridization-dependent off-target effects with short read RNAseq. Using the computational tools rMATS and Whippet, we identified differential splicing events of which only a minority could be explained by hybridization, illustrating the difficulty of predicting off-target effects based on sequence homology. The main splicing events could all be validated with RT-PCR. Furthermore, from the three AONs studied, one AON induced considerably more changes in gene expression and splicing compared to the two other AONs assessed, which was confirmed in a validation experiment. Our study demonstrates that interpretation of short read RNAseq data to determine off-target effects is challenging. Nonetheless, valuable results can be obtained as it allows the comparison of toxicity between different AONs within an experiment and identification of AON-specific off-target profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.