ArticlePloS one2025
Automation in microinjection for zebrafish pericardial space with image-based motion control and batch agarose microplate.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Reproducible Electroporation Strategy for CRISPR-Cas9 RNP and mRNA Delivery in Fish Embryos.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microinjection enables the precise delivery of substances into specific areas of small animals, such as zebrafish, whose xenograft models can be a promising platform for developing rapid and personalized cancer therapies. However, manual microinjection exhibits experimental variability and low reproducibility, as it relies on the expertise of researchers. To address these problems, automated microinjection systems have been developed in recent years. In this study, we propose a microrobotic system based on an image recognition AI model that extracts key feature points to define the pericardial space in zebrafish larvae at 2 days post-fertilization. Using the geometric relationships among feature points, the system optimizes the glass capillary insertion motion for precise microinjection. We also introduced a batch agarose microplate that prevents dehydration while stabilizing the larvae, which improved the survival rate compared to the conventional plate (log-rank test, p < 0.0001). The proposed automation system achieved success rates of 80.8% (n = 1129) for microinjection and a 92.1% (n = 1143) for survival. Moreover, we successfully injected colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 and SW620) into the pericardial space, resulting in an engraftment success rate of 96.2% (n = 610). Our system exhibits higher success rates and reproducibility compared to manual microinjection, allowing even inexperienced researchers to perform stable injections. These results demonstrate that our system effectively enhances the efficiency and reproducibility of experiments involving zebrafish-based cancer research and xenograft model generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.