Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066530›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2025

Diagnostic Implications of Renin Reactivity in Confirmatory Tests: A Comparative Study of Direct Renin Concentration and Plasma Renin Activity in Primary Aldosteronism.

Tomoyuki Nagasaka, Yoshiaki Hishida, Hiroki Yasuda, Shuhei Kusuda, Nanami Ikeda, Shutaro Uchiyama, Yui Kubo, Mayuko Kano, Tomoko Nakagawa, Yuta Nakamura and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tomoyuki NagasakaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yoshiaki HishidaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-4258
Hiroki YasudaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shuhei KusudaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Nanami IkedaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shutaro UchiyamaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yui KuboDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7517-7909
Mayuko KanoDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Tomoko NakagawaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yuta NakamuraDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shiko AsaiDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Kenichi YokotaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9648-182X
Keiko YanagisawaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Masakatsu SoneDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0757-7529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Renin measurement is a key to diagnosing primary aldosteronism (PA). However, it remains unclear whether plasma renin activity (PRA) or direct renin concentration (DRC), which are based on different principles, offer superior performance. This study aimed to compare their diagnostic potential in PA. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a single institution, and enrolled consecutive patients hospitalised for PA diagnosis. PRA and DRC were measured for the same samples during the captopril challenge, saline infusion, and furosemide upright tests. We evaluated renin responsiveness, defined as renin changes from baseline in each test, and the relationship between PRA and DRC. Results: Seventy-two patients were classified into PA and non-PA groups. The patients in the PA group were further classified into unilateral and bilateral PA groups using adrenal vein sampling. The renin responsiveness positivity was significantly higher for DRC than for PRA in the PA group across all tests. The DRC/PRA ratio did not differ significantly between PA and non-PA groups, while the DRC/PRA ratio was significantly lower in the unilateral PA group than in the bilateral PA group. The correlation between PRA and DRC was weak in the PA group, especially in the low-renin range. Conclusions: Renin changes were more consistently detected with DRC than with PRA in the low-renin range. The DRC/PRA ratio was lower in unilateral PA than in bilateral PA, suggesting potential utility for recognising unilateral PA, although this finding should be considered exploratory.

Indexed as

direct renin concentrationplasma renin activityPrimary aldosteronismrenin responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID41066530
PMCPMC12569981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.