Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066520›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Probing the molecular determinants of Ty1 retrotransposon restriction specificity in yeast.

Sean L Beckwith, Matthew A Cottee, J Adam Hannon-Hatfield, Abigail C Newman, Emma C Walker, Justin R Romero, Jonathan P Stoye, Ian A Taylor, David J Garfinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Capsid flexibility during Ty1 virus-like particle assembly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sean L BeckwithDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-1030
Matthew A CotteeMacromolecular Structure Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3619-3057
J Adam Hannon-HatfieldDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-5167
Abigail C NewmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0703-1434
Emma C WalkerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4746-1556
Justin R RomeroDepartment of Biology, Hope College, Holland, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9496-6819
Jonathan P StoyeRetrovirus-Host Interactions Laboratory. The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3377-323X
Ian A TaylorMacromolecular Structure Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-3852
David J GarfinkelDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-2426

Funding

Effectors of retrotransposon movementR01GM124216 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI GARFINKEL, DAVID J. · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
Evolution of Retrotransposon Control MechanismsR01GM156837 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CASEY M BERGMAN, David J. Garfinkel · 2025 to 2026
$744k
Retrotransposon virus-like particle assemblyF32GM139247 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BECKWITH, SEAN · 2020 to 2021
$134k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM139247NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124216NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM156837Wellcome Trust CC2029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary history of retrotransposons and their hosts shapes the dynamics of transposition and restriction. The Pseudoviridae of yeast includes multiple Ty1 LTR-retrotransposon subfamilies. Saccharomyces cerevisiae prevents uncontrolled retrotransposition of Ty1 subfamilies using distinct mechanisms: canonical Ty1 is inhibited by a self-encoded restriction factor, p22/p18, whereas Ty1' is inhibited by an endogenized restriction factor, Drt2. The minimal inhibitory fragment of both restriction factors (p18m and Drt2m) is a conserved C-terminal capsid domain. Here, we use biophysical and genetic approaches to demonstrate that p18m and Drt2m are highly specific to their subfamilies. Although the crystal structures of p18m and Drt2m are similar, three divergent residues found in a conserved hydrophobic interface direct restriction specificity. By mutating these three residues, we re-target each restriction factor to the opposite transposon. Our work highlights how a common lattice-poisoning mechanism of restriction evolved from independent evolutionary trajectories in closely related retrotransposon subfamilies. These data raise the possibility that similar capsid-capsid interactions may exist in other transposons/viruses and that highly specific inhibitors could be engineered to target capsid interfaces.

Indexed as

RetroelementsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCapsid ProteinsEvolution, MolecularModels, MolecularCapsid ProteinsRetroelementsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41066520
PMCPMC12530519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.