ArticlePloS one2025
Surgical placement possibilities, audiological benefit, and quality of life following Bonebridge implantation in children.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study's primary goal was to evaluate how smaller size of the BCI602 transcutaneous bone conduction implant affects surgical placement possibilities in children compared to its precursor model, the BCI601. Additionally, audiological benefits, quality of life, and surgical safety of the implant system were investigated in a retrospective cohort of 21 patients. Computed tomography imaging data of the previously implanted patients were examined using a surgical planning software to determine which locations on the scull were feasible for placing the floating mass transducer of the respective implant version. Audiological outcomes in terms of sound field audiometry, speech recognition threshold, and speech recognition in noise were assessed. The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) and the Assessment of Quality of Life 6 Dimensions (AQoL-6D) questionnaires were used to assess subjective benefit in terms of hearing and quality of life. Evaluation of placement options revealed that placement of the BCI602 in the transmastoid plane was possible in 100% of the children, as well as in 89.5% of the cases with the BCI601 variant when using lifts. Likewise, it would be possible to place the BCI602 in 100% of patients superior to the temporal line. For the older BCI601 version, this would be possible only in 58% of cases. With the implant, audiological performance as well as subjective benefit scores improved significantly in the study population. The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, significantly improved quality of life, and low complication rates. Its combination of high safety, significant audiological benefits, and easy placement of the BCI602 makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option for hearing rehabilitation in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.