Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Introducing FMEA plus method for comprehensive safety risk assessment in the steel industry.

Ahmad Soltanzadeh, Esmaeil Zarei, Mohsen Mahdinia, Kiana Hosseinzadeh, Mohsen Sadeghi-Yarandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad SoltanzadehResearch Center for Environmental Pollutants, Department of Occupational Safety & Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Qom, Iran.
Esmaeil ZareiDepartment of Safety Science, College of Aviation, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-5578
Mohsen MahdiniaResearch Center for Environmental Pollutants, Department of Occupational Safety & Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Qom, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-3438
Kiana HosseinzadehDepartment of Occupational health and safety engineering, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mohsen Sadeghi-YarandiHealth in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-8591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing the challenge of employing a comprehensive risk analysis approach that effectively captures and quantifies all contributing factors remains a significant endeavor in both academic research and practical field applications. This study endeavors to fill this gap by introducing a practical safety risk assessment approach, named the FMEA+ method, grounded in the conventional Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. To construct a comprehensive taxonomy that encompasses the contributing factors within each dimension of risk, a three-stage Delphi study engaged 35 Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was employed to acquire knowledge and assign weights to the factors and sub-factors. The validation and reliability assessment of the developed taxonomy included evaluating the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI), and Cronbach's alpha coefficient, yielding values of 0.77, 0.91, and 0.86, respectively. Independent peer reviews and reality checks further substantiated the credibility of the proposed taxonomy. The introduced safety risk assessment algorithm, FMEA + , derived from the FMEA technique, comprises three main factors and 12 sub-factors. The final normalized weights for the three factors-occurrence, severity, and detectability-were determined to be 0.337, 0.348, and 0.315, respectively. In the three factors of occurrence, severity, and detection, the most important sub-factors identified were human reliability, human injury, and technical inspection, respectively. This proposed taxonomy serves as a foundational tool for facilitating informed decision-making and the effective implementation of risk mitigation strategies. The application of this innovative approach offers a scientific alternative to traditional FMEA methods within similar industries, addressing existing challenges in a more comprehensive and nuanced manner.

Indexed as

SteelAlgorithmsDelphi TechniqueFuzzy LogicHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSteel

Identifiers

PMID41066463
PMCPMC12510507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.