ArticlePloS one2025
Metrics for assessing stability of marsh sill living shorelines: Identifying main drivers of marsh boundary degradation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marsh sill living shorelines are increasingly common nature-based features in coastal estuaries used to mitigate shoreline erosion and enhance coastal resilience. Evaluating the stability of these structures is crucial for shoreline design and coastal management strategies. Although several metrics have been developed to assess the stability of natural tidal marshes, their suitability for the created marshes of living shorelines is still unclear. This research compiles and analyzes data from 18 marsh sill living shorelines in Maryland, USA - nine with continuous sills and nine with segmented sills. We characterize their eco-geomorphic features and hydrodynamics with 15 metrics through both field sampling and remote sensing. Among the 15 metrics, six representative ones are selected to identify the major factors influencing potential marsh boundary degradation in marsh sill living shorelines. Our findings indicate that living shorelines with ponding at the marsh edge have a significantly higher Unvegetated/Vegetated Ratio (p < 0.05) and a lower sediment deposition rate (p < 0.1). Gap/Rock ratio and Relative Exposure Index contribute significantly to differences between living shorelines with and without ponding, explaining 5.46% and 4.41% of the variation, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). Functional marsh width, introduced here as a novel metric, shows a varying relationship with sediment deposition rate depending on whether the deposition rate exceeded or fell below the relative sea level rise. A marsh width of approximately 5-10 meters appears to optimize both cost-effectiveness and sediment accumulation. By integrating data across regional ecosystems, this study advances our understanding of potential degradation processes in living shorelines, offering valuable insights for shoreline design and post-construction maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.