ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of human development, primary care coverage and the COVID-19 pandemic on the fertility rate among adolescents in Brazil in the period 2012-2021.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high fertility rate (FR) in adolescents is a global public health problem, with the Americas region having the second highest FR in the world. This study aims to carry out a temporal and spatial analysis of the FR in adolescents in Brazil in the period 2012-2021 and evaluate the effects of primary care population (PCP) coverage on the FR in adolescents in different contexts of human development, measured by the Municipal Human Development Index (HDI-M). This is an ecological study developed in three stages: 1) time trend analysis of the FR in girls aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years; 2) spatial analysis of the FR in girls aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years; and 3) analysis of the effect of PCP coverage on the FR in girls aged 10-19 years in different contexts of HDI-M, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the period from 2012 to 2021, FR for girls aged 10-14 and 15-19 years had a statistically significant decrease, going from 3.4 to 2.4 and from 61.9 to 45.3 per 1,000, respectively. In the year 2021, the downward trend attenuated for girls aged 15-19 years and stopped for girls aged 10-14 years. Clusters with high FR were observed in the North and Midwest regions of the country. Higher FR were observed in municipalities with lower HDI-M and lower PCP coverage, with the increase in PCP coverage having a more intense effect on reducing the FR in municipalities with lower HDI-M. There was an attenuation of the effect of the increase in PCP coverage in the FR during the pandemic period, reinforcing the importance of guaranteeing access to sexual and reproductive health services even in contexts of health crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.