Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066442›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2025

Zinc as adjunct treatment for clinical severe infection in young infants: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in India and Nepal.

Nitya Wadhwa, Antara Sinha, Sudha Basnet, Sugandha Arya, Raghvendra Singh, Mamta Jajoo, Ayushi, Dharmendra Sharma, Ajay Kumar, Harish K Pemde and 12 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Nitya WadhwaMaternal and Child Health, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-1842
Antara SinhaMaternal and Child Health, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-6754
Sudha BasnetDepartment of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-2499
Sugandha AryaDepartment of Pediatrics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Raghvendra SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-0982
Mamta JajooDepartment of Pediatrics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-798X
AyushiMaternal and Child Health, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-930X
Dharmendra SharmaMaternal and Child Health, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1798-5906
Ajay KumarDepartment of Neonatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-5950
Harish K PemdeDepartment of Pediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6605-1041
Varinder SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, Delhi, India.
Ram H ChapagainMedical Department, Kanti Children's Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-5471
Anuradha GovilDepartment of Pediatrics, Kasturba Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5522-0338
Debjani R PurakayasthaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0120-7612
Ganesh P ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Medha MittalDepartment of Pediatrics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-1698
Laxman P ShresthaDepartment of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-5080
Harish ChellaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9519-827X
Halvor SommerfeltCentre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health and Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Tor A StrandCentre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health and Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-151X
Shinjini BhatnagarMaternal and Child Health, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-5296
Zinc Sepsis Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnually, an estimated 2.3 million infants die within their first month of life, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Infections, including sepsis are among the major contributors to these deaths. Effective interventions added to standard antimicrobial therapy can reduce sepsis mortality. A recent meta-analysis suggests that adjunct zinc treatment of young infants with sepsis could reduce case fatality risk. This study evaluated the efficacy of zinc as an adjunct to antibiotics in young infants with suspected sepsis, defined as clinical severe infection (CSI). METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across seven hospitals in India and Nepal from February 28, 2017, to February 22, 2022. Infants aged 3-59 days hospitalized with suspected sepsis, defined as CSI, adapted from the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) criteria, were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg of elemental zinc daily or placebo orally for 14 days, in addition to standard of care. The primary outcomes were death during hospitalization and death within 12 weeks after enrollment. Among 3,153 enrolled infants (1,203 [38%] females), the median age at enrollment was 25 days (interquartile range 13-41 days), and the mean weight was 2.9 kg (standard deviation 0.8). During the hospital stay, 64 (4.1%) of 1,576 infants died in the zinc arm compared to 77 (4.9%) of 1,577 in the placebo arm (relative risk [RR] 0.83 (95% CI [0.60, 1.15]; p = 0.267)). Among those who completed 12 weeks of follow-up, 140 of 1,554 infants (9.0%) died in the zinc arm, and 133 of 1,550 (8.6%) in the placebo arm (RR 1.05 (95% CI [0.84, 1.32]; p = 0.674)). Adverse events were similar across trial arms, except for a slight increase in vomiting in the zinc arm; no events were attributed to the intervention. The main limitation of the study is that it was underpowered due to lower-than-anticipated event rates and a shortfall in the achieved sample size.

conclusionsIn this setting, we found little evidence for an effect of adjunct zinc therapy on young infants with CSI on the risk of dying during hospitalization or for the subsequent 3 months. Our findings contrast previous studies that used more specific case definitions. This underscores the need for further RCTs to evaluate the effect of zinc in young infant sepsis before it can be recommended in treatment guidelines.

trial registrationClinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/02/007966) on February 27, 2017, and Universal Trial Number is U1111-1187-6479.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsSepsisZincDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNepalTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsZinc

Identifiers

PMID41066442
PMCPMC12527131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.