Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066432›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Deep learning predictions on a new dataset: Natural gas production and liquid level detection.

Dong Wang, Jian Lian, Chengjiang Li, Yanlei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dong WangSchool of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jian LianSchool of Intelligence Engineering, Shandong Management University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-8454
Chengjiang LiSwinburne University of Technology, Shandong University of Sci & Tech, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yanlei WangShandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the energy sector, accurate forecasting of natural gas production and liquid level detection is crucial for efficient resource management and operational planning. This study proposes an integrated deep learning model by incorporating bidirectional long short-term memory and Informer, for predicting these critical parameters. The bidirectional long short-term memory model, a type of recurrent neural network, is renowned for its ability to capture temporal dependencies in sequential data, making it a strong candidate for time series forecasting. On the other hand, Informer, a recent advancement in the field, offers an innovative self-attention mechanism that can handle long-term dependencies with reduced computational complexity. In addition, these models are implemented by using a comprehensive dataset of natural gas production and liquid level detection, applying rigorous preprocessing and feature engineering techniques to enhance model performance. The proposed deep learning models are evaluated on the dataset comparing with the state-of-the-art algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of both models for gas production and liquid level detection, simultaneously. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing insights into the application of advanced deep learning techniques in the energy sector and offers a benchmark for future research in this domain.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNatural GasAlgorithmsForecastingNeural Networks, ComputerNatural Gas

Identifiers

PMID41066432
PMCPMC12510609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.