ArticlePloS one2025
Barriers and promoters to adapting research findings to clinical care in hereditary angioedema in the United States: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Experience with Treatment of HAE Attacks: Results from a Real-World Survey of Physicians and Their Patients.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Hereditary angioedema in Latin America: international recommendations, expert consensus, and reported implementation barriers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A Treat-to-Target approach in hereditary angioedema: expert consensus from a European committee.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment options for hereditary angioedema (HAE) have evolved due to discoveries in basic and clinical research. HAE clinical guidelines emphasize optimizing quality of life through attack prevention strategies that include long-term prophylaxis. We sought to identify barriers to and promoters of research translation into HAE clinical practice that may inform efforts to improve patient care. We interviewed US allergy/immunology clinicians who completed an online continuing medical education activity on HAE or were identified through healthcare provider directories. Interviews focused on clinicians' experiences translating HAE research results into clinical care. Deidentified interview transcripts were coded and analyzed to detect emergent themes using Dedoose software. Thematic analysis of 15 interviews showed that insurance prior authorization for HAE medications, including those for long-term prophylaxis, was perceived as the biggest barrier to evidence-based care. Other prominent barriers were laboratory testing difficulties, time constraints, and deficits in both primary care provider and patient understanding of HAE. Promoters of research translation included availability of medication samples, route/frequency of drug administration, and shared decision-making. Clinicians used different resources to learn about HAE, including online chat rooms. None of the clinicians used a validated instrument to assess HAE-related quality of life. Perceptions of the usefulness of HAE clinical guidelines were mixed. A range of factors act as barriers and promoters to research translation into clinical care for patients with HAE. Our findings have implications for interventions to enhance the delivery of evidence-based care for patients with HAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.