ArticlePloS one2025
Extraintestinal Escherichia coli from camel carcasses: Phylogroups, serotypes, and markers of virulence.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathogenic Escherichia coli causes infections responsible for economic losses in animal herds worldwide. Although this bacterium is well studied in livestock and poultry, studies of camelid infections caused by extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) are limited. In this study, a set of ExPEC from camel carcasses (n = 150) was characterized with respect to phylogenetic groups, 162 O serotypes, and 35 virulence-associated genes (VAGs) using PCR screening. ExPEC frequently belonged to phylogroup B1 (58.7%), followed by phylogroups C, A, and B2 (12.7%, 12.0%, and 9.3%, respectively). Additionally, the set of ExPEC contained 36 different serotypes. The ExPEC isolates were found to typically encode ≥5 tested VAGs, particularly those related to adhesion (afaI, fimA, pap, sfa, tsh), iron acquisition (fyuA, iroN, iucC, sitA), host cell damage (α-hly, cdt, cnf1, sat), invasion (ibeA), and bacterial protection (iss, ompT, traT). Moreover, ExPEC from camel adults and calves were different from each other. Among isolates from calves, prevalence was significantly higher for phylogroups C (q < 0.001) and E (q < 0.01), and ten VAGs, including fitness factors (eitA, fepC, fyuA, iroN, iss, iucD, ompT, sitA), as well as VAGs with stronger link to pathogenicity (hlyF, and pap). To identify potential reservoir of camel ExPEC strains, fecal E. coli (n = 139) from healthy camels were also analyzed. Based on the identified characteristics, ExPEC were distinguishable from fecal isolates of healthy camels, suggesting an exogenous source of ExPEC infections, likely transmitted from wild birds and human keepers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.