ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of mental health and burnout between medical and nonmedical students.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The relationship between academic burnout and problematic smartphone use: a three-level meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Social media use motives and academic performance among Saudi medical students: the mediating role of perceived stress.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high rates of mental health issues and burnout among medical students have been well established. Some suggest that these high rates are due to medical studies being particularly demanding compared to other undergraduate training. However, research comparing the mental health and burnout of medical and nonmedical students yields inconsistent findings and is limited by small sample sizes as well as infrequent consideration of potential confounding risk factors. This study aimed to complement past research by comparing the mental health and burnout of medical students to those of the nonmedical students at the same university, while accounting for confounding risk factors. A total of 1057 medical and 870 nonmedical students participated in the study, completing validated questionnaires measuring mental health (depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, anxiety) and burnout (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, academic efficacy), as well as 14 risk factors pertaining to sociodemographic (incl. deprivation), lifestyle, psychological characteristics, life stress, and social relations. After conducting t-tests to compare the two groups, the impact of the risk factors was assessed with adjusted regressions. Results revealed that medical students reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, anxiety symptoms, and cynicism than nonmedical students. They also presented fewer of the examined risk factors. After adjusting for these factors, medical students still exhibited lower suicidal ideation and cynicism, but all other differences became non-significant. Moreover, when accounting for risk factors, a new significant difference appeared, with medical students presenting more emotional exhaustion than nonmedical students. These findings suggest that medical studies are not inherently more taxing than other undergraduate disciplines. Both medical and nonmedical students face significant mental health challenges, likely reflecting the typical strains of young adulthood, exacerbated by the pressures of demanding studies. The results underscore the need for holistic interventions to support the mental well-being of all undergraduate students, regardless of their discipline or faculty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.