Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066321›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Impacts of enrichment programs on cognitive and affective skills of gifted students: A meta-analysis.

M Davut Gül, Zekai Ayık

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Davut GülDepartment of Special Education, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0437-5865
Zekai AyıkDepartment of Special Education, Harran Unversity, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-6543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aims to study research on enrichment programs for gifted students and synthesize the effects on cognitive and affective skills reported by studies conducted between 2014-2024 years. During the screening process, the focus was on quantitative studies published between 2014 and 2024 that explored the influence of enrichment programs (ER) on cognitive and affective abilities of gifted students. Searches were carried out in Web of Science and Scopus databases for publications in English. The researchers examined publication bias by analysing data using various methods, including the funnel plot, Begg's test, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill test. Additionally, the researchers utilized Classic fail-safe N and Orwin's fail-safe N values for further analysis. Hedges's g was used to report the magnitude or strength of the standardized mean differences between groups in a study as effect size, since it provides effect size for smaller sample sizes. A total of 16 publications included in this meta-analysis, and results demonstrated that enrichment programs had a large effect on cognitive skills (g = 1.14, 95% CI [.83, 1.45], under random-effect model), a medium effect on affective personal skills (g = .51, 95% CI [.30,.73], under random-effect model), and small impact on affective social skills (g = .44, 95% CI [.23,.66], under random-effect model). This review underscores nuanced findings focusing on sub-domains of achievement, higher-order thinking, and personal and social-affective skills. The overall results implied that enrichment programs play a significant role in fulfilling both the cognitive and non-cognitive needs of gifted students.

Indexed as

AffectChild, GiftedCognitionStudentsHumansSocial Skills

Identifiers

PMID41066321
PMCPMC12510610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.