ArticlePloS one2025
Identifying graft incompatible rootstocks for sweet cherry through machine learning algorithms.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graft incompatibility is a key factor in the development of dwarf and semi dwarf rootstocks for sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) to improve yield, fruit quality, precocity, and labor efficiency. This study evaluated the graft incompatibility of eight genotypes three sweet cherry, three sour cherry, and two mahaleb collected from Northern Anatolia, a native region for cherries. These genotypes, along with standard rootstocks Gisela 6 and SL 64, were grafted with '0900 Ziraat' and 'Lambert' cultivars. Graft incompatibility was assessed using a multidisciplinary approach combining classical morphological and anatomical evaluations with advanced data driven analyses. Parameters such as graft bud growth rate (40.26-86.21%), shoot length (41.01-91.28 cm), and rootstock/scion diameter ratio (0.41-0.92) were measured 12 months after grafting. Principal Component Analysis, Random Forest modeling with SHAP values, and Bayesian ranking were applied to identify key traits and rank genotype performance. The integrated analysis successfully distinguished compatible rootstock candidates, identifying five genotypes with high compatibility potential. These findings demonstrate that combining traditional phenotypic evaluation methods with machine learning-based approaches offers a robust and comprehensive framework for addressing graft incompatibility, and contributes valuable insights for future breeding programs and rootstock selection strategies in sweet cherry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.