Observational studyPloS one2025
Shear Wave Elastography for measuring the elastic properties of the Psoas Major muscle: An intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe psoas major (PM) plays an important role in population with low back pain (LBP). Its evaluation considers clinical history, which can be confused with other lumbar and lower limb conditions, physical examination, with an inconsistent palpation, and imaging tests that provide inconclusive parameters in various studies. Therefore, developing reliable assessment procedures to evaluate PM elastic properties is necessary to improve diagnosis and follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate the intra and inter-examiner reliability of shear wave elastography (SWE) for calculating the PM stiffness in patients with LBP.
designObservational study.
methodsLongitudinal views of the of the PM muscle using SWE were acquired bilaterally in 52 volunteers experiencing moderate LBP and disability. All measurements were performed twice, involving the assessment of shear wave speed and Young's modulus as indicators of stiffness, with data collected by an experienced examiner and a novice examiner.
resultsTest-retest reliability showed strong consistency regardless of the examiner's level of experience, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) exceeding 0.9 for both metrics. However, experienced examiners achieved smaller minimal detectable changes. Inter-examiner reliability was comparatively lower, with ICCs ranging from 0.854 to 0.925, and notable differences in mean values between examiners were observed (p < 0.01).
conclusionExcellent test-retest reliability was observed for the measurement of PM muscle stiffness in chronic LBP patients using SWE by both experienced and novice evaluators, although statistically significant differences were found between the two trials for the novice examiner. Inter-examiner reliability was lower, highlighting variability between assessors. To minimize errors and improve consistency and accuracy, if multiple examiners are involved, averaging measurements is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.