ArticlePsychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy2025
Development of the organizational trauma resilience-patient reported experience measure for people with HIV in the Southern United States.
Article in Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-implementation Stage Research to Guide Trauma-Informed Care for Youth With HIV in the Southern US: A Multimethod Study.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePeople with HIV are disproportionately affected by psychological trauma, compared to people without HIV. Trauma-informed care has the potential to improve health outcomes, but limited evaluation tools have been validated for people with HIV.
methodWe developed the Organizational Trauma Resilience-Patient Reported Experience Measure through community engagement, cognitive interviews, readability testing, and classical test theory.
resultsThe Organizational Trauma Resilience-Patient Reported Experience Measure is a 40-item index comprising two subscales, each containing three dimensions. All subscales were unidimensional and had excellent reliability (Organizational Credibility = .979 and Culturally Responsive Trauma Resilience = .975) and overall scale item consistency (validity; Organizational Credibility = .839; Culturally Responsive Trauma Resilience = .795). Convergent and discriminant validity were established, demonstrating how the instrument relates to other constructs.
conclusionsInitial development of the Organizational Trauma Resilience-Patient Reported Experience Measure marks several novel contributions to the trauma-informed care knowledge base and is a first step toward measuring the extent to which people with HIV perceive their care environments to be safe, stable, and nurturing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.