ReviewChemical reviews2025
Understanding Degradation in Single-Crystalline Ni-Rich Li-Ion Battery Cathodes.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sn-Driven Grain Boundary Elimination for Single-Crystalline Ni-Rich Cathodes with Superior High-Voltage Stability in Lithium-Ion Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Nanoscale Failure Mechanism and Nanoengineering Modification Strategies of Layered NCM Cathodes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanostructured Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries: Synthesis, Morphology, and Performances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- How Surface Reconstruction Drives Heterogeneous Bulk Delithiation in Single-Crystalline Ni-Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes.Small science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing demand for ever-higher-energy-density Li-ion batteries has accelerated the development of Ni-rich transition metal (TM) oxide cathodes. Despite their potential, unsolved degradation mechanisms continue to limit their practical capacity and cycle life. Single-crystalline morphologies have emerged as a promising solution, offering superior mechanical and structural stability compared to polycrystalline cathodes. Nevertheless, degradation still occurs, driven by atomic-scale instabilities, interfacial side reactions, and particle-level mechanical strain. To address these challenges, this review systematically examines cathode development from the atomic to cell level and provides critical insight into how different material design strategies can enhance long-term performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.