ReviewCurrent opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery2026
What can we learn about chronic rhinosinusitis through mucus?
Review in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation of Local Nasal Biomarkers and Olfactory Dysfunction in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewSinonasal mucus biomarkers have emerged as a powerful, noninvasive tool to better understand the immunopathology of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This review highlights the evolving role of mucus biomarkers as they move from discovery-phase research toward potential clinical implementation and identifies critical gaps that must be addressed before their integration into routine decision-making. RECENT
findingsMucus biomarkers provide valuable insights into CRS endotypes, disease severity, olfactory dysfunction, and potentially biologic choice. Recent studies have shown associations between mucus cytokine and protein profiles with postoperative olfactory recovery, polyp recurrence, and responsiveness to biologic therapy. Advances in collection devices hold potential to standardize sampling methods, while machine learning approaches are increasingly being applied to high-dimensional biomarker datasets, improving the ability to predict outcomes and guide therapy selection. Despite these advances, unresolved challenges include optimal sampling site, assay standardization, and prospective validation in clinical trials. SUMMARY: Mucus biomarkers are transforming our understanding of CRS by linking local immune dysfunction with clinical manifestations, such as quality-of-life impairment, olfactory loss, and disease recurrence. With continued refinement, integration of mucus biomarker profiling with machine learning and clinical datasets may enable precision diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies for CRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.