ArticleEpilepsia2026
Syndromic and etiological classification predicts seizure freedom in childhood and youth onset epilepsy: A population-based study from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study.
Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends in epilepsy and the Chinese experience: Epidemiological transitions, underlying mechanisms, and integrated strategies (1990-2021).Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Self-Limited Focal Epilepsies in Childhood: How Many and How to Treat.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study was undertaken to determine the proportion of individuals with childhood and youth onset epilepsy who attain seizure freedom across seizure types, epilepsy types, etiologies, and syndromes using the latest International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classifications. Secondary objectives were to identify predictors of seizure freedom, evaluate time to last seizure among those achieving it, and estimate prevalence of active epilepsy.
methodsWe used data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study, a nationwide population-based cohort of ~114 000 children born 1999-2009. Pediatric epileptologists validated and classified epilepsy cases through medical record review. Analyses included 1044 individuals with ≥12 months of follow-up. Seizure freedom was ≥12 months without seizures, with or without antiseizure medication (ASM), at end of follow-up. Predictors of seizure freedom were assessed using log-binomial regression adjusted for follow-up. Time to last seizure was analyzed using Accelerated Failure Time models. Active epilepsy at any age was defined as seizures during the preceding 2 years and/or ASM use at that age; prevalence was calculated annually from ages 0 to 18 years.
resultsMedian follow-up was 10.6 years. A total of 78% achieved seizure freedom. Predictors of reduced likelihood of seizure freedom included early (<2 years) or adolescent onset, multiple seizure types, status epilepticus, developmental comorbidities, and abnormal neurologic findings. Seizure freedom was most common in focal epilepsy (84%) and least in combined generalized and focal epilepsy (26%). It was highest for unknown etiology (89%) and lowest for structural (58%) and identified genetic etiologies (54%). Favorable outcomes were seen in self-limited focal epilepsies, childhood absence epilepsy, and self-limited infantile syndromes. Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies had lower rates. Among those seizure-free, median time to last seizure was 2.0 years. Prevalence peaked at age 11 years (490 per 100 000) and varied by syndrome. SIGNIFICANCE: This population-based study supports the prognostic value of syndrome- and etiology-based ILAE classifications in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.