Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066125›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Clinical Significance of a Multicancer Screening Trial With Stage-Based End Points.

Kemal Caglar Gogebakan, Jane Lange, Lukas Owens, Amalie Pinderup, Roman Gulati, Larry G Kessler, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Ruth Etzioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kemal Caglar GogebakanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Jane LangeCancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Lukas OwensDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Amalie PinderupEpidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Roman GulatiDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Larry G KesslerDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Georgios LyratzopoulosEpidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ruth EtzioniDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
Statistical modeling to support population and translational cancer researchR50CA221836 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Roman Gulati · 2017 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA221836NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The first randomized screening trial of a multicancer early detection test is ongoing, with the primary end point being the incidence of late-stage cancer. The unprecedented use of a stage-based end point and short 3-year follow-up raise questions about how results should be interpreted and used in developing multicancer screening policy. Objective: To estimate outcomes of the trial and to identify information from the estimates that may aid in interpreting results of short-term trials evaluating multicancer screening tests. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicancer decision-analytic model estimated outcomes from registry data from the England National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service for cases diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2018. This model simulated a population-based multicancer screening trial of average-risk participants without a prior cancer diagnosis. The analysis was performed between April 2024 and April 2025. Interventions: Three annual multicancer screenings at months 0, 12, and 24. Cancers were assumed detectable 1 or 2 years before clinical diagnosis based on a published analysis, and cancer-specific early-stage sensitivities were set to either 100% or 50% of published sensitivities among clinically diagnosed cases. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reductions in late-stage (stage III-IV) cancer incidence over 3 years, cancer mortality over 5 years, and contributions of each cancer type to reductions in late-stage incidence and cancer mortality across the range of detectable intervals and early-stage sensitivities. Results: The model simulated 70 000 participants per arm (screening and control; median age, 66 years), and estimated that the overall late-stage incidence reductions at 3 years ranged from 6% to 23%, with corresponding reductions in 5-year cancer mortality from 6% to 9%. Colorectal cancer contributed the most to the reduction in late-stage incidence (28% to 39%), while lung cancer contributed the most to mortality reduction (40% to 42%). Conclusions and Relevance: This independent decision-analytic model study found that the trial could achieve nontrivial cancer downstaging over 3 years, but modest mortality reduction over 5 years. These results were due to a limited number of target cancer types, underscoring the importance of transparent reporting of outcomes by cancer type, consideration of mortality implications, and careful preplanning for subsequent evaluation steps by the cancer research community.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningNeoplasmsAgedClinical RelevanceEnglandFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41066125
PMCPMC12511994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.