Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066122›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Lung Cancer Incidence After September 11, 2001, Among World Trade Center Responders.

Sean A P Clouston, Jaymie Meliker, Frank D Mann, Pei-Fen Kuan, Yuan Yang, F Mehejabin Trina, Laura Sampson, Paolo Boffetta, Norman H Edelman, Benjamin J Luft

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Errors in Table 2.JAMA network open · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sean A P CloustonProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Jaymie MelikerProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Frank D MannProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Pei-Fen KuanDepartment of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Yuan YangProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
F Mehejabin TrinaProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Laura SampsonProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Paolo BoffettaProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Norman H EdelmanProgram in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Benjamin J LuftDepartment of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

Funding

A lifecourse approach to PTSD and cognitive aging: A cohort of 9/11 respondersR01AG049953 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CLOUSTON, SEAN · 2015 to 2024
$11.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Responders involved in rescue and recovery operations after the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001, were exposed to airborne carcinogens. Objectives: To examine the incidence of lung cancer after the WTC attacks and to compare the incidence of lung cancer among responders with varying degrees of exposure severity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective cohort study, data were collected between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2023, from individuals who were enrolled in a medical monitoring program available to WTC responders residing on Long Island, New York. This study was restricted to people who survived and were followed up for incident lung cancer after a 10-year latency period. Exposures: Types and durations of exposures were based on responses to a detailed questionnaire about on-site work conditions, which included information about the type and duration of work, smells, and sights while working; exposure to dust; and the use of protective equipment. World Trade Center exposure characteristics and overall severity were measured as mild, moderate, and severe exposure using a validated approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidence of lung cancer was the primary outcome. Diagnosis of lung cancer was ascertained following a standardized approach by trained clinicians, and diagnoses were verified by clinicians at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios. Result: Among 12 334 eligible responders (mean [SD] age at study inclusion, 49.3 [10.2] years; 11 213 men [90.9%]), 118 incident lung cancers were identified between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2023 (incidence rate, 8.7/10 000 person-years [95% CI, 7.3-10.5 person-years]). When compared with mild exposures, the incidence of lung cancer was higher among moderately (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.86 [95% CI, 1.19-2.91]; P = .007) and severely (AHR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.69-4.99]; P < .001) exposed groups. Specific WTC exposures, including smelling fumes (AHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09]; P = .007) or sewage (AHR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P = .004), were also associated with higher incidence of lung cancer after adjusting for demographics and measures of tobacco use. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of WTC responders, the incidence of lung cancer was higher among those with greater exposure severity. Future studies may investigate specific WTC exposures and histologic changes and clarify the role of WTC exposure for prognosis.

Indexed as

Emergency RespondersLung NeoplasmsOccupational ExposureSeptember 11 Terrorist AttacksAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41066122
PMCPMC12511991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.