Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066121›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Pregnancy Preferences and Incident Pregnancy in the US.

Brooke W Bullington, Isabel Muñoz, W John Boscardin, Corinne H Rocca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brooke W BullingtonDivision of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Isabel MuñozDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine.
W John BoscardinDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine.
Corinne H RoccaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine.

Funding

Advancing Innovative Measurement of Pregnancy Preferences with Longitudinal DataR01HD105764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROCCA, CORINNE H. · 2022 to 2024
$804k
Research Training Program in Reproductive and Sexual HealthR25HD115514 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JESSICA N SANDERS, David Turok · 2024 to 2026
$474k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105764NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD115514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Examining associations of pregnancy and childbearing desires with incident pregnancy is vital to understanding whether individuals attain their reproductive preferences. Much of the existing population-based research is limited by simplistic measurement of pregnancy desires and retrospective study designs. Objective: To assess the prospective association of pregnancy preferences with incident pregnancy and to investigate the degree to which people's attainment of their pregnancy preferences differs by sociodemographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used longitudinal data from the Surveys of Women, state-representative prospective studies of reproductive-aged females from 9 US states (Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina, and Wisconsin). Participants were recruited between November 2016 and July 2020 and followed up for 2 to 3 years, depending on the state. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 44 years and female. Analyses included participants who, at the start of each 1-year observation period, could experience pregnancy (ie, not pregnant, no tubal ligation, and not infertile). Data were analyzed from May 2024 to April 2025. Exposures: The primary exposure was preferences about a potential pregnancy within 3 months and childbearing within 1 year, measured using the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale. Scores were categorized into low, midrange, and high desire to avoid pregnancy. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was self-reported incident pregnancy over the year after completing the DAP scale. Differences in incident pregnancy were examined within DAP score grouping by sociodemographic characteristics using model-estimated probabilities of pregnancy. Results: The sample included 9565 unique participants (3256 participants [weighted percentage, 48%] aged <30 years) who contributed 18 603 annual longitudinal observations. A majority of participants were nulliparous (4066 participants [weighted percentage, 51%]) or lived with a romantic partner (5952 participants [weighted percentage, 59%]). An estimated 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) of participants with high DAP scores reported pregnancy over a year, compared with 8% (95% CI, 7%-9%) of those with midrange DAP scores and 25% (95% CI, 23%-27%) of those with low DAP scores. The association of DAP score with pregnancy differed by age, parity, prior-year birth, cohabitation with partner, education level, employment, and racial and ethnic identity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of reproductive-aged females, realization of pregnancy preferences varied by sociodemographic characteristics, highlighting reproductive inequities. These results may be used to inform public health efforts to provide contraception, abortion, preconception, and fertility care.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPregnancyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41066121
PMCPMC12511997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.