ArticleJAMA network open2025
Pregnancy Preferences and Incident Pregnancy in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Approaches to Measuring Prospective Fertility Desires in the United States: A Population-based Study.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- Pregnancy intentions by sexual orientation among pregnancies across the life course.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Association between parental age at childbirth and timing of puberty in children: an 8-year cohort study.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Examining associations of pregnancy and childbearing desires with incident pregnancy is vital to understanding whether individuals attain their reproductive preferences. Much of the existing population-based research is limited by simplistic measurement of pregnancy desires and retrospective study designs. Objective: To assess the prospective association of pregnancy preferences with incident pregnancy and to investigate the degree to which people's attainment of their pregnancy preferences differs by sociodemographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used longitudinal data from the Surveys of Women, state-representative prospective studies of reproductive-aged females from 9 US states (Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina, and Wisconsin). Participants were recruited between November 2016 and July 2020 and followed up for 2 to 3 years, depending on the state. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 44 years and female. Analyses included participants who, at the start of each 1-year observation period, could experience pregnancy (ie, not pregnant, no tubal ligation, and not infertile). Data were analyzed from May 2024 to April 2025. Exposures: The primary exposure was preferences about a potential pregnancy within 3 months and childbearing within 1 year, measured using the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale. Scores were categorized into low, midrange, and high desire to avoid pregnancy. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was self-reported incident pregnancy over the year after completing the DAP scale. Differences in incident pregnancy were examined within DAP score grouping by sociodemographic characteristics using model-estimated probabilities of pregnancy. Results: The sample included 9565 unique participants (3256 participants [weighted percentage, 48%] aged <30 years) who contributed 18 603 annual longitudinal observations. A majority of participants were nulliparous (4066 participants [weighted percentage, 51%]) or lived with a romantic partner (5952 participants [weighted percentage, 59%]). An estimated 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) of participants with high DAP scores reported pregnancy over a year, compared with 8% (95% CI, 7%-9%) of those with midrange DAP scores and 25% (95% CI, 23%-27%) of those with low DAP scores. The association of DAP score with pregnancy differed by age, parity, prior-year birth, cohabitation with partner, education level, employment, and racial and ethnic identity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of reproductive-aged females, realization of pregnancy preferences varied by sociodemographic characteristics, highlighting reproductive inequities. These results may be used to inform public health efforts to provide contraception, abortion, preconception, and fertility care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.