Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066120›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Patients With Narcolepsy.

Chih-Wei Hsu, Yen-Shan Yang, Yang-Chieh Brian Chen, Liang-Jen Wang, Mu-Hong Chen, Yao-Hsu Yang, Chih-Sung Liang, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing mortality risk in narcolepsy: Evidence from population studies.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Reply to "Unexpectedly higher mortality in non‑type 1 narcolepsy: diagnostic heterogeneity or unmeasured confounders?"Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Reply to "Veteran status as an underappreciated confound in narcolepsy mortality".Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Veteran status as an underappreciated confound in narcolepsy mortality.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Mortality in narcolepsy and other sleep clinic patients: a 25-year propensity-matched VA cohort study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chih-Wei HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yen-Shan YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yang-Chieh Brian ChenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Liang-Jen WangDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Mu-Hong ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yao-Hsu YangHealth Information and Epidemiology Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi County, Taiwan.
Chih-Sung LiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Beitou Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Edward Chia-Cheng LaiSchool of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Narcolepsy is a sleep disorder potentially affecting mortality, yet evidence on this association remains sparse. Objective: To examine whether narcolepsy is associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2001 to 2021, with patients followed up until death or December 31, 2022. Patients were aged 6 years or older with 2 or more narcolepsy diagnoses from psychiatrists or neurologists. Controls were selected from the NHIRD as a population-based sample. Controls without narcolepsy were matched in a 1:4 ratio on sex and birth date (±6 months). Sibling controls were siblings without narcolepsy. Statistical analysis was performed from January to April 2025. Exposures: Clinical narcolepsy diagnosis, confirmed via NHIRD records (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 347 or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code G47.4). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, measured as hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for birth year, sex, income, urbanization, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific mortality (natural, unnatural, accidents, suicides). Results: Of 3187 patients with narcolepsy (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [16.1] years; 1674 male patients [52.5%]) and 12 748 controls (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [16.1] years; 6696 male patients [52.5%]), 132 patients with narcolepsy and 456 controls died. Psychiatric comorbidities, especially depression (1167 of 3187 [36.6%] vs 861 of 12 748 [6.8%]) and anxiety (1054 of 3187 [33.1%] vs 853 of 12 748 [6.7%]), were more common in the narcolepsy group than in the control group. Crude all-cause mortality rates were 44.3 per 10 000 person-years among patients with narcolepsy and 38.1 per 10 000 person-years among controls. All-cause mortality was not increased among patients with narcolepsy (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.17). There was no increase among patients with narcolepsy in cause-specific mortality for natural causes (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11), unnatural causes, (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.83-2.40), accidents (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.64-2.95), and suicides (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.62-3.22). The sibling cohort analysis similarly demonstrated no significantly increased risk among patients with narcolepsy of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.63-2.06) or cause-specific mortality from natural causes (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.28-1.56), unnatural causes (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.87-4.98), accidents (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.48-5.37), or suicides (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 0.88-13.28). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Taiwanese residents, narcolepsy was not associated with excess all-cause or cause-specific mortality. These findings reduce immediate clinical concern, but the wide 95% CIs suggest that a modest increase in risk cannot be excluded; replication in other populations with longer follow-up is warranted.

Indexed as

NarcolepsyAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCause of DeathChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTaiwanYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41066120
PMCPMC12511998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.