Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066117›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025

Predicting Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome in International Space Station Astronauts.

Tyson J Brunstetter, Sara S Mason, Suzi Osborne, Millennia Young, Thomas Oswald, C Robert Gibson, Nimesh Patel, Thomas H Mader, Andrew G Lee, David M Brown and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tyson J BrunstetterNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas.
Sara S MasonAegis Aerospace, Houston, Texas.
Suzi OsborneKBR, Houston, Texas.
Millennia YoungNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas.
Thomas OswaldKBR, Houston, Texas.
C Robert GibsonKBR, Houston, Texas.
Nimesh PatelUniversity of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Thomas H MaderNASA Ophthalmology Consultant, Moab, Utah.
Andrew G LeeBlanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
David M BrownRetina Consultants of America, Houston, Texas.
Ann TsungKBR, Houston, Texas.
William TarverNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) could severely impact astronaut performance during long-duration spaceflight (LDSF). The pathophysiology of SANS remains elusive, and no predictors of SANS have been discovered; reliable prediction may offer novel insight into individual susceptibility and interperson variability for SANS and permit prelaunch preparations for in-flight treatment. Objective: To conduct a preliminary analysis of SANS flight data to determine mission-to-mission trends in SANS diagnosis and optic disc edema (ODE) severity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, ocular testing, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), was completed preflight, during flight, and postflight, then retrospectively analyzed in a unique cohort of US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) astronauts who completed 2 LDSF missions onboard the International Space Station (ISS) from 2007 to 2024. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to April 2025. Exposure: Weightlessness, with average durations of 6 months for each mission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was SANS or non-SANS diagnosis, determined by OCT-based ODE data (when available after 2013) for each mission. Results: Of 71 NASA astronauts who have participated in ISS LDSF, 16 (22.5%) have completed 2 long-duration missions. Four astronauts (20%) were female, and mean ages of astronauts participating in missions 1 and 2 were 46.1 (4.0) and 53.5 (5.2) years, respectively. For these 16 individuals, a SANS diagnosis or nondiagnosis from prior LDSF predicted SANS diagnosis during subsequent LDSF (sensitivity, 85.7%; 95% CI, 42%-100%; specificity, 100%; 95% CI, 66%-100%; positive predictive value, 100%, 95% CI, 54%-100%; negative predictive value, 90%; 95% CI, 56%-100%; P < .001). A subset of this group (5 participants, 10 eyes) possessed an objective metric of ODE across both missions (ie, change in peripapillary total retinal thickness within 250 µm of Bruch membrane opening [ΔTRT]). For individual eyes, ΔTRT of a prior LDSF mission was highly predictive of ΔTRT for a subsequent LDSF (r = 0.94; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, SANS cases from previous LDSF were highly likely to be diagnosed with SANS in subsequent LDSF missions and vice versa, while SANS ODE severity appeared remarkably similar across LDSF missions for individual eyes. To our knowledge, these findings represent the first and only reliable forecast for SANS, permitting precise in-flight treatment and prevention strategies to be tailored for individual astronauts in subsequent LDSF missions, even before launch.

Indexed as

AstronautsPapilledemaSpace FlightVision DisordersWeightlessnessAdultDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, Optical CoherenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41066117
PMCPMC12512026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.