ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2025
Reevaluation of Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct.
Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensorineural hearing loss in early childhood after passing newborn hearing screening.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Expansion ofGenes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), the most prevalent inner ear malformation causing hearing loss (HL) in various populations, is predominantly genetically mediated. Despite advancements in genetic diagnostics, the comprehensive phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of EVA remains insufficiently characterized. Objectives: To characterize the natural history, clinical outcomes, phenotype, and genotype of EVA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, longitudinal, retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2003 to October 2022, with follow-up until July 1, 2024. Patients with EVA who were seeking medical advice at the Chinese PLA General Hospital were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study presents a 21-year longitudinal analysis of Chinese patients with EVA, providing a systematic analysis of the natural history, phenotypic diversity, and molecular etiology of EVA. Results: Of 2774 patients, 1453 (52.4%) were female individuals, and the median (range) age was 8 (4 months to 45 years) years. This study identified that 124 of 341 patients (36.36%) with EVA received passing newborn hearing screening results, while 375 of 597 (62.8%) received a diagnosis through combined audiological and radiological assessments. Recurrent vertigo (256 of 597 [42.9%]) and goiter (38 of 597 [6.4%]) were common comorbidities. Genetic analysis revealed that 2661 of 2774 patients (95.9%) carried biallelic SLC26A4 variants, with 70 (2.5%) attributable to copy number variants and 13 (0.5%) to a deep-intronic variant (c.304 + 941C>T) that affected splicing. A de novo heterozygous FOXI1 variant (c.483_485delCAA) was identified in an EVA family, indicating an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. A stepped genomic analysis strategy was associated with an improved molecular diagnosis rate of 95.9%, highlighting the necessity of comprehensive genetic testing beyond traditional coding regions. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study underscore the importance of periodic hearing surveillance and tailored genetic counseling for patients with EVA, offering substantial implications for prevention, management, and future gene therapy approaches. This study provides an extensive phenotypic and genotypic characterization of EVA, potentially advancing an understanding of its molecular underpinnings and clinical heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.