Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066086›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

An Approach to Design Adaptive Clinical Trials With Time-to-Event Outcomes Based on a General Bayesian Posterior Distribution.

James M McGree, Antony M Overstall, Mark Jones, Robert K Mahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James M McGreeSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-8929
Antony M OverstallSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mark JonesSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Robert K MaharMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3643-923X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials are an integral component of medical research. Trials require careful design to, for example, maintain the safety of participants and to use resources efficiently. Adaptive clinical trials are often more efficient and ethical than standard or non-adaptive trials because they can require fewer participants, target more promising treatments, and stop early with sufficient evidence of effectiveness or harm. The design of adaptive trials is usually undertaken via simulation, which requires assumptions about the data-generating process to be specified a priori. Unfortunately, if such assumptions are misspecified, then the resulting trial design may not perform as expected, leading to, for example, reduced statistical power or an increased Type I error. Motivated by a clinical trial of a vaccine to protect against gastroenteritis in infants, we propose an approach to design adaptive clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes without needing to explicitly define the data-generating process. To facilitate this, we consider trial design within a general Bayesian framework where inference about the treatment effect is based on the partial likelihood. As a result, inference is robust to the form of the baseline hazard function, and we exploit this property to undertake trial design when the data-generating process is only implicitly defined. The benefits of this approach are demonstrated via an illustrative example and via redesigning our motivating clinical trial.

Indexed as

Adaptive Clinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials as TopicResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationGastroenteritisHumansInfantLikelihood FunctionsModels, StatisticalTreatment Outcomeadaptive designBayesian designpartial likelihoodproportional hazardsrobust inferencesequential design

Identifiers

PMID41066086
PMCPMC12510400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.