Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066076›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Adaptive Biomarker-Based Design for Early Phase Clinical Trials.

Alessandra Serra, Gaëlle Saint-Hilary, Sandrine Guilleminot, Julia Geronimi, Pavel Mozgunov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessandra SerraUniversity of Cambridge, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8431-5154
Gaëlle Saint-HilaryDepartment of Statistical Methodology, Saryga, France.
Sandrine GuilleminotTranslational Statistics Department, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Julia GeronimiTranslational Statistics Department, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Pavel MozgunovUniversity of Cambridge, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC UU00040/03National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying and quantifying predictive biomarkers is a critical issue of Precision Medicine approaches and patient-centric clinical development strategies. Early phase adaptive designs can improve trial efficiency by allowing for adaptations during the course of the trial. In this work, we are interested in adaptations based on interim analysis permitting a refinement of the existing study population according to their predictive biomarkers. At an early stage, the goal is not to precisely define the target population, but to not miss an efficacy signal that might be limited to a biomarker subgroup. In this work, we propose a one-arm two-stage early phase biomarker-guided design in the setting of an oncology trial where at the time of the interim analysis, several decisions can be made regarding stopping the entire trial early or continuing to recruit patients from the full or a selected patient population. Via simulations, we show that, although the sample size is limited, the proposed design leads to better decision-making compared to a classical design that does not consider an enrichment expansion.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicResearch DesignBiomarkers, TumorComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalPrecision MedicineSample SizeBiomarkersBiomarkers, Tumorcontinuous biomarkerearly phasepersonalized medicinepredictive

Identifiers

PMID41066076
PMCPMC12510287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.