ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
The spatial ventricular gradient is a non-invasive, vectorcardiographic correlate of cardiac fibrosis.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac MRI (CMR) markers of myocardial fibrosis and infiltration are diagnostically and prognostically important in cardiomyopathies. A noninvasive ECG correlate of CMR interstitial fibrosis measurements (extracellular volume [ECV] and native T1) could assist in diagnosis, risk stratification, and tracking disease progress. The spatial ventricular gradient (SVG) is a vectorcardiographic (VCG) measure of electrical heterogeneity obtained from a 12-lead ECG. The link between the SVG and CMR-derived myocardial interstitial fibrosis is unknown.
methodsRetrospective study of patients referred for CMR from 2018-2022 at a single academic center, with an ECG performed within 30 days. VCGs were constructed from 12-lead ECGs, and SVG vector components were calculated. ECV and T1 values were regressed on SVG components, demographics, and ECG parameters using linear regression.
resultsIn total, 345 patients met inclusion criteria: 55% male, median age 60.2 (P25-P75 47.4-69.9) years, and median LVEF 57 (P25-P75 44-63)%. Median SVG magnitude was 39.5 (P25-P75 28.2-58.2) mV∙ms and SVG magnitude was inversely correlated with ECV and T1 (p < 0.001 for both). In a multivariable model, SVG magnitude remained independently associated with ECV and T1 after adjustment for body mass index, LVEF, age, and sex (p < 0.01). Patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy had the most abnormal values of ECV and T1; no amyloid patient had SVG magnitude > 50 mV∙ms.
conclusionSVG magnitude is correlated with CMR-derived ECV and native T1. Patients with high SVG magnitude were not observed to have a large burden of diffuse fibrosis or infiltration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41066057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.