SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Risk of dementia in patients treated with anticholinergics for overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous tibial neuromodulation, is the future of neuromodulation here?World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Prescribing Patterns and Treatment Persistence for Overactive Bladder in Japan Across Medical Specialties and Facility Types: A Nationwide Claims Database Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Spectrum and signals of medication-associated cognitive disorder: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis with cross-database validation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary anticholinergic (AC) medications are commonly prescribed for Overactive Bladder (OAB) syndrome. Although recent studies suggest a potential link between their use and an increased risk of dementia, this association remains debated.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of dementia in patients receiving AC treatment for OAB syndrome. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. Outcomes of interest included dementia risk and its association with age, sex distribution, treatment duration, and follow-up length. Two subgroup analyses were assessed: (1) AC vs. no drug therapy and (2) AC vs. mirabegron, a beta-3 agonist and current standard of care for OAB syndrome. Relative risk (RR) with p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsEight studies were included, comprising a total of 3,656,686 patients diagnosed with OAB syndrome, of whom 44.7% were exposed to urinary AC. The comparison between AC and no drug therapy showed a statistically significant higher risk of dementia in the exposed group (RR 1.2, 95% CI [1.09-1.32], I²=96%, p < 0.01). When the AC group was compared to patients who received Mirabegron, the AC use also presented a statistically significant increase in dementia risk (RR 1.28; 95% CI [1.03-1.58], I²=98%, p = 0.02).
conclusionsPatients who received urinary AC therapy for OAB syndrome were associated with an increased risk of dementia compared to both no drug therapy and medical therapy with mirabegron. These findings suggest that, for the long-term treatment of adult patients with OAB syndrome, alternative therapeutic options to AC should be considered, with Mirabegron emerging as a valid choice in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41066055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.