SynthesisProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Efficacy and Safety of Probiotic Supplementation for Neonatal Jaundice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Probiotic mediated modulation of neonatal health: a meta-analysis of prematurity-related morbidity, jaundice, and respiratory distress.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal jaundice (NJ) is a common condition in newborns. Probiotics provide health benefits to the host and are widely used to treat various diseases, including neonatal gastrointestinal disorders. However, their efficacy and safety in NJ remain uncertain. Given the relationship of the neonatal bilirubin metabolism to gastrointestinal function, we aimed to synthesize evidence on the effects of probiotics supplementation on NJ. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure up to January 2025. The eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of probiotics in NJ. Two reviewers independently completed study selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Continuous outcomes of interest were pooled as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the inverse variance method with random-effects models. Thirty trials with 2776 neonates were included. Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced total serum bilirubin levels from day 1 (MD - 0.35, 95% CI - 0.63 to - 0.06) to day 10 (MD - 1.74, 95% CI - 2.54 to - 0.95) mg/dL. Infants who received probiotics supplementation also showed a significantly shorter duration of phototherapy (MD - 17.09, 95% CI - 24.43 to - 9.76) hours and hospitalization (MD - 1.17, 95% CI - 1.60 to - 0.74) days. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation was associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects, including diarrhea, rashes, and fevers. These benefits were consistent in both preterm and full-term infants. In conclusion, probiotic supplementation may be a well-tolerated adjunctive therapy with short-term benefits for NJ; however, cautious clinical application is warranted, particularly regarding sustained effects. Future large-scale RCTs are needed to validate our findings, optimize treatment approaches, and evaluate long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41066046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.