Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025
Effects of low tidal volume on dynamic arterial elastance in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effect of reducing tidal volume from 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) to 6 mL/kg PBW on dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) in patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery.
methodAfter the start of intra-abdominal insufflation, if MAP became < 65 mmHg and SVV > 10%, then the tidal volume was reduced from 8 mL/kg PBW to 6 mL/kg PBW. One min later, 250 mL of lactate Ringer's solution was administered over 10 min. MAP responsiveness was defined as a > 10% increase in MAP following a fluid challenge.
resultsThis study included 46 patients, 11 MAP non-responders and 35 MAP responders. Both PPV and SVV decreased significantly (- 19.4 ± 11% and - 19.7 ± 9.9%, respectively) following tidal volume reduction. However, the magnitude of the decrease differed. As a result, the change in Eadyn was minimal on average, although inter-individual variability was observed. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of - 0.004, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from - 0.285 to + 0.278. Eadyn values before and after tidal volume reduction failed to predict MAP responsiveness (at 8 mL/kg PBW: area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.514, at 6 mL/kg PBW: AUC 0.508).
conclusionThe reduction in tidal volume had a clinically negligible effect on Eadyn. Neither Eadyn values at tidal volume of 8 mL/kg PBW and 6 mL/kg PBW could not predict MAP increase after a fluid challenge during laparoscopic surgery.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the UMIN-CTR Clinical Database (ID: UMIN000054061) on April 4th, 2024. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi? recptno=R000061722.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41066040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.