Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066036›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025

An evaluation of pre-post antimicrobial stewardship healthcare educational intervention studies utilizing the Kirkpatrick model: a scoping review.

Ziad G Nasr, Hanin M Said, Kaoutar R Barakat, Raghad M Elwan, Aya Maklad, Zachariah J Nazar

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ziad G NasrDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. znasr@qu.edu.qa.
Hanin M SaidDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Kaoutar R BarakatDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Raghad M ElwanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Aya MakladDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Zachariah J NazarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund UREP 30-173-5-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) education plays a vital role in addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), yet its long-term impact on behavior and clinical outcomes remains underexplored. Educational interventions are often assessed through knowledge-based outcomes, with limited evaluation of sustained practice changes or patient-level results, and standardized higher-level outcome measures across diverse healthcare settings.

aimThis scoping review aimed to map pre-post AMS healthcare educational interventions using the Kirkpatrick Model, evaluating their effectiveness across its four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. The goal was to identify trends, highlight gaps, and provide insight into reported outcomes, delivery methods, and evaluation tools, supporting future research and strengthening the evidence base for AMS education.

methodThis review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. A literature search of nine databases identified studies from 2010 to 2024. Eligible studies included pre-post AMS educational interventions targeting undergraduate students and healthcare professionals (HCPs) and reporting outcomes which were subsequently mapped by the reviewers to the Kirkpatrick Model. Data were categorized by target population, delivery format, and evaluation tools. Narrative synthesis was used to describe trends and relationships.

resultsStudies targeted HCPs such as physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and dental professionals, and undergraduate students in pharmacy, medicine, nursing, and dentistry. Sixty-three studies were included. Outcomes were distributed across Level 1 (Reaction) (n = 46, 24%), Level 2 (Learning) (n = 51, 27%), Level 3 (Behavior) (n = 50, 26%), and Level 4 (Results) (n = 45, 23%). While n = 24 (38%) assessed all four levels, another n = 24 (38%) reported mixed or partial levels. Face-to-face or online-only formats achieved Levels 1 and 2. Whereas blended or workplace-integrated interventions more often demonstrated behavior change and clinical outcomes (Levels 3 and 4). Longitudinal follow-up and mixed evaluation tools (e.g., surveys, chart reviews, interviews) supported higher-level impacts. Pharmacy-led, interdisciplinary, and contextually tailored interventions mapped to all levels.

conclusionAMS education often leads to short-term learning gains, but fewer interventions achieve sustained behavior change or measurable clinical outcomes. Blended and practice-integrated formats, paired with long-term evaluation, are key to realizing the full potential of AMS education. Embedding such approaches in undergraduate and professional programs can better prepare the future HCPs to address AMR effectively.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipHealth PersonnelModels, EducationalHumansAntimicrobial stewardshipHealth care outcomesHealth personnelProfessional educationProgram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41066036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.